Cherokee Web Server… when lighter and faster is a must


Sometimes when it comes to choosing a web server we always end up in the same decision: Apache… it’s alright, it’s the most widely used web server but that doesn’t mean it’s the best one.

When we started with Inkzee we didn’t think too much about other alternatives… we started with Apache and it’s not that we had big complaints about it, but having all the backend in one machine made us have performance/low resource consumption requirements and after a few months of our service running the all the different backend subsystems were almost killing the server and we started to research alternatives.

We were going to change Apache for Lighttpd but then we stepped into Cherokee statistics and after reading some reviews we decided to give it a try, the numbers spoke for themselves. We had been checking on Che

rokee for some years now, the project was mature enough for our needs so we went for it.

After a year and a half we can write our own lessons-learned from our experience:

  • The Cherokee team have been so responsive to every problem or tweak we wanted to do with our server.
  • The admin interface is pretty rad, if you are not used to messing with config files you’ll find no challenge.
  • We didn’t miss anything: FastCGIPHP, TLS and SSL, Load Balancer, Reverse Proxy, statics cache, …
  • And the most important for us: our servers stand the load so much better now… indeed now we are still able to have our service in just one server ;)

So, dare to try it now that Cherokee is celebrating their version 1.0 release, it’s a really nice product worth trying.

, , , , ,

  1. #1 by sadotmd - September 3rd, 2010 at 17:08

    Have you considered nginx as alternative?

(will not be published)

  1. No trackbacks yet.